While hard on commuters, the recent Translink fare hike (see Brisbane Times coverage) still leaves South-East Queensland with a heavily subsidised public transport system, which it will continue to have given a relatively low population density and historically poor choices of public transport investments. For instance, although commuters favour trains because they are viewed as more comfortable and reliable than buses, they are much more expensive to provide than buses, except in areas with very high population densities. While using trains for public transport might make sense in London, New York or Paris, there are big questions around their viability in less dense Australian cities. See, for example, this US study which provides an excellent literature review regarding urban rail transit investments in the US:
Urban Densities and Transit: A Multi-dimensional Perspective
My previous thoughts on public transport can be found in several posts, including:
Govt should explore transport demand management options before committing to costly infrastructure
SEQ’s extensive but costly public transport system requires thorough review
Also see Brad Rogers’s guest post which links heritage protection to low, inefficient population densities in Brisbane’s inner city:









