4% unemployment rate target looking much less achievable now

With Queensland’s unemployment rate at 6.7%, compared with 5.8% one year ago, debate has resumed over the Government’s pledge to reduce unemployment to 4% within two terms (see the Courier-Mail’s coverage). I’ve previously commented that, when the promise was made, it was technically achievable, but probably not sustainable for very long (see The 4% unemployment rate target – achievability vs sustainability). Now with the unemployment rate more than one percentage point higher than when the Government took office in March 2012, there are doubts about whether 4% would be achievable by the end of the Government’s next term (assuming it’s re-elected). As you can see from the historical data in the chart below, the unemployment rate can take a long time to fall from a peak.

unemployment_since_78The unemployment rate can take a long time to fall because there is a hard core of unemployed people who find it hard to get jobs even when conditions are good, and because, as the labour market improves, people marginally attached to the labour force (e.g. some stay-at-home mums) come back in looking for work. Unemployment goes up in an elevator, but comes down on an escalator – as I recall PM John Howard saying in an interview once.

The chart also shows just how far below the historical average of the unemployment rate the 4% target is. Even allowing for economic reforms that have improved the functioning of the labour market – by calculating the average over the last twenty years instead of since 1978 – a 4% unemployment rate looks very difficult to reach and sustain.

Commentary on today’s labour force data by other Queensland bloggers includes:

Aussie jobs surprise

The trend is your friend


This entry was posted in Labour market and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to 4% unemployment rate target looking much less achievable now

  1. Gene, hope you don’t mind but I used the ABC interview and this post as inspiration for a post of my own about whether the 4% target can be met; and what we need to see if it is to be met. http://www.conus.com.au/?p=834
    Cheers, Pete

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s