Conditions will certainly improve in the Queensland building industry over 2014 as residential building approvals continue to recover (see first chart below based on the new ABS data), although we shouldn’t get too excited yet because the recovery appears to be driven by the volatile other residential sector, which includes apartments and townhouses (see second chart below). This was also observed by Pete Faulkner in his post from yesterday (Units skew building approvals). Also, given total approvals are still below pre-financial crisis levels, I think it’s premature to talk of “boom-like approvals,” which is how a UBS economist quoted in Paul Syvret’s article in today’s Courier-Mail describes the approval figures.
-
Recent Posts
- If you’re sick of politics BAU, check out my Pirate Party economics podcast interview
- Economic update: interest rates, monetary policy, fiscal policy, and coal prices
- Coaldrake integrity inquiry submission
- Unemployment and state budgets update
- Will the Brisbane Olympics stack up? The Federal Parliamentary Library investigates
Top Posts & Pages
- Heat map of Brisbane metro property prices – big opportunities in the Western corridor?
- Is Townsville or Cairns the capital of North Qld?
- Qld Economic Outlook for 2022
- Additional maps on average incomes in Qld
- Where do Queensland's super rich live?
- Fake privatisation of Titles Registry helping Qld Gov’t pretend it has debt management plan
- Official Qld unemployment rate of 7.9% doesn’t tell the full story
- Top twenty largest cities and towns in Queensland by population
- Where is residential development occurring in the Brisbane metro area?
- Strata ‘Management Rights’ must be reviewed by the Qld Gov’t – guest post by Stephen Thornton
Archives
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
Categories
- Agriculture
- Arts
- Basin Plan
- Brisbane
- Budget
- Cairns
- China
- Climate change
- Competition policy
- Crime
- Cyclones
- Education
- Energy
- Environment
- Exports
- Floods
- Gladstone
- Gold Coast
- Health
- Housing
- India
- Industry policy
- Infrastructure
- Ipswich
- IR
- Labour market
- Mackay
- Macroeconomy
- Media
- Migration
- Mining
- nfps
- North Queensland
- Population
- Productivity
- queensland
- Queensland Government
- Queensland Rail
- qut
- Retail trade
- Rockhampton
- Social policy
- Tax
- Toowoomba
- Tourism
- Townsville
- Trade
- Transport
- Uncategorized
- VET
- Water
- Wide Bay-Burnett
Blogroll
Very interesting – the puzzle with this apartment property bubble is – who is buying the apartments. What is driving property developers to increase their stock of apatments for sale. ?
> My initial guess is that the apartments will be spruiked to the baby boomers, and their SMSF. According to the ATO just 3.4% of total DIY SMSF are invested in residential property. While this percentage seems low, it represents $17B already. Access to these funds would drive the bubble in low maintenance, income producing, apartment approvals once gearing and compliance with the funds is simplified. Property developers are certainly driving the way for the flexibility to use super funds for property investment.
> Perhaps more likely, foreign investment. International investment in the US is drying up, prompting a re-direction of capital. Australia is sought after because of its physical attributes, as well as a welcoming population, and access to visas. Given our only limitation to foreigners owning property is that it be a new development – this will certainly direct Chinese and Asian investment into inner city apartments.
> Could it be the baby boomers downsizing, leaving suburban blocks for inner city living.
> Perhaps the new generation of Australian workers have attributed value to their commuting time, and are no longer willing to pay high public transport fees, and spend valuable hours in a crowded train.
> Perhaps the surge is actually lead by Apartment King and billionaire Harry Triguboff’s advice to look to Queensland for longer-term capital growth. His developments in Brisbane including the The 74 Floor Soleil project (464 apartments) , and the 81 Floor Infinity residential tower (549 apartments) are enough to account for the surge you have observed.
Looks like we had all better get used to apartment living………..
Good question about who is buying the apartments. I wonder whether developers have over-estimated likely demand. With all this apartment stock coming up I expect we’ll see some very cheap apartments in the next few years.
Your point re. SMSFs is a good one. Thanks.
I don’t think the increased proportion of other residential should be wholly discounted as a fillip for the construction industry as it may also simply represent a continuation of the shift in residential housing away from traditional free-standing houses.
“With all this apartment stock coming up I expect we’ll see some very cheap apartments in the next few years”
Logically you would think so but I don’t think that the up and coming generation who are increasingly locked out of home ownership by high prices should get their hopes up too early. If history is anything to go by, the property and finance sectors will likely find a way to keep prices going up or at the very least, not falling by any significant amount, regardless of the level of actual demand for the real purpose which housing is meant to serve. Their ingenuity at keeping bubbles inflated is admirable.
While I generally deplore the situation, I also take the broader view in which I see this as at least providing employment and economic activity as the mining investment boom begins to wind down. As a very important aside, we should note that mining investment may have likely peaked but has not yet begun to significantly decline – it would be premature to declare that the evidence shows that the winding down of the enormous boom is going to be easily weathered. The real decline simply hasn’t begun yet in the bigger picture.
Here in Gladstone, the peaking of the local resource investment boom – or at least, the peaking of the construction workforce – has been keenly felt, with local rents tumbling – http://www.sqmresearch.com.au/graph_median_rent_weeks.php?postcode=4680&t=1 – though they remain somewhat elevated compared to history. But when it comes to BUYING, we can see that while prices peaked in 2012, they have not come down by any great amount. http://www.sqmresearch.com.au/graph_median_weeks.php?postcode=4680&t=1 I suspect this is because so much Gladstone property was bought up by investors, who are unwilling to realise a loss despite the fact that it will probably take another boom to get property moving like it was 18 months – 2 years ago (I’m told by those in the local industry that apart from the usual Christmas rush, it’s been very sluggish).
So it’s interesting to note that locally at least, we have lots of supply, limited demand…….but prices aren’t really moving to adjust to the situation.
Good points. Thanks for the interesting info re Gladstone.