A new ABS study on educational outcomes at Queensland State Schools confirms the importance of socio-economic factors in school performance, and also reveals a surprisingly large gap in NAPLAN performance between boys and girls (see chart below I’ve copied and pasted). More boys are failing to meet minimum standards than girls. The data are for 2011, so possibly the situation has improved since then, but I doubt it. The gap between boys and girls doesn’t appear to be a problem solely in Queensland, although the gap appears larger than at the national level (based on ABS data from the 2000s which suggests a 5 percentage point gap rather than the nearly 10 percentage point gap we see in Queensland on writing performance). The Queensland Education Department should further investigate this gap in performance between boys and girls and consider whether policy changes are required, such as single-sex classes, which have previously been successfully trialled in Queensland (as reported in the Courier-Mail).
-
Recent Posts
Top Posts & Pages
- Heat map of Brisbane metro property prices – big opportunities in the Western corridor?
- Where do Queensland's super rich live?
- Cross River Rail cost blowout means project doesn’t stack up
- Top twenty largest cities and towns in Queensland by population
- Coal price crash is bad news for the state budget and future capital investment
- Ten years since Queensland lost its AAA credit rating
- ACCC right to call for Qld Gov’t to cut stamp duty on home insurance - $200 in stamp duty on each NQ home insurance policy on average
- Queensland has too many low-performing schools
- A closer look at the surge in net interstate migration to Qld in September quarter 2020
- Qld state debt debate is challenging for both sides
Archives
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
Categories
- Agriculture
- Arts
- Basin Plan
- Brisbane
- Budget
- Cairns
- China
- Climate change
- Competition policy
- Crime
- Cyclones
- Education
- Energy
- Environment
- Exports
- Floods
- Gladstone
- Gold Coast
- Health
- Housing
- India
- Industry policy
- Infrastructure
- Ipswich
- IR
- Labour market
- Mackay
- Macroeconomy
- Media
- Migration
- Mining
- nfps
- North Queensland
- Population
- Productivity
- queensland
- Queensland Government
- Queensland Rail
- qut
- Retail trade
- Rockhampton
- Social policy
- Tax
- Toowoomba
- Tourism
- Townsville
- Trade
- Transport
- Uncategorized
- VET
- Water
- Wide Bay-Burnett
Blogroll
I am reading this post with my 10 year old nephew, and also as a mother of both a boy and a girl – so our comments are based on first hand and and relevant experience.
I am not surprised by this data – and certainly not alarmed.
Boys and girls have very different developmental milestones. You only need to look at a Grade 7 class to see the extreme physical and developmental difference between boys and girls of the same age. Boys are earlier developing physical, spatial, and classification skills. Girls are earlier developing literacy skills.
The statistic stated above are clearly showing this time related , developmental difference, and should not be interpreted as boys under-performing.
Longitudinal studies would show that boys and girls skills in numeracy, reading and writing would generally peak at different rates and ages for each gender.
I don’t think that single sex classes are the solution – but recognition between the different learning capabilities and timeframes of boys and girls is important.
Thanks for the comment, Katrina. Good points.
Gene
A great post. I wonder if the difference between the genders is as great within the private school system where there is a high proportion of single sex schools?
Good question, Jim. I’ll have a look for any research on the issue.