Govt Actuary finds insurers struggling to understand catastrophe risk

North Queensland apartment owners will have to put up with the massive insurance premium increases (e.g. more than 300%) they have experienced in recent years after an Australian Government Actuary report concluded the premium increases most likely reflected the market waking up to the higher level of risk posed by disasters such as Cyclone Yasi. The Actuary’s report, however, contains some brilliant commentary on the insurance industry’s practices, suggesting it doesn’t really have much of an idea how to price the risk from major natural disasters in premiums. For example:

…catastrophe reinsurance costs are now increasingly allocated in line with the assessed risk presented by the underlying policy. Having said that, catastrophe modelling remains an inexact science…

…in the insurance market, the cost of the product being sold (this refers to the value of the underlying risk) can only be estimated and often only quite poorly. This makes ‘accurate pricing’ of some business segments difficult. Strata title in NQ is one such small business segment.

Given these doubts about the science of insurance premium pricing, it’s possible the premiums NQ residents are paying are higher than justified by the true risks involved. KS at Loose Change has coverage of this issue, too, and he is skeptical about the Government’s suggestion that property owners should negotiate a higher excess in exchange for lower premiums:

Stop Press: Strata Whitewash!

This entry was posted in Cairns, Climate change, Cyclones, North Queensland and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Govt Actuary finds insurers struggling to understand catastrophe risk

  1. KS says:

    It is clear that the issues extend well beyond what could have been addressed by the AGA. Which is what I have always contended. There is also catastrophe data at the Insurance Council website back to 1970. I don’t think there is any debate that there have been three serious La Nina events to impact Qld since WW2. These are 1954/5; @1974; and the last few years. The analysis from the AGA covers only the most recent extreme years?

    The Risk Frontiers unit at Macquarie Uni would seem to be the most appropriate to analyse this but recent research has been almost all floods ……

    • Gene Tunny says:

      Useful info. Thanks. It’s pretty clear the insurance companies have over-reacted to recent events. There’s definitely an opportunity for a competitor to take market share off the current players.

  2. Pingback: Insurance Council admits ignorance on strata insurance hikes and funds JCU research | Queensland Economy Watch

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s