Does tourism promotion on a Statewide basis make sense?

A report in the Courier-Mail that the Government is considering a cut to Tourism Queensland’s funding reminded me of a comment by Simon Anholt, an international advisor on national branding, in the latest Monocle (p. 93, Issue 55) regarding the debate around whether South Australia needs to re-brand itself (e.g. by renaming itself Bradman):

Apart from anything else, who cares?…You’d struggle to name a single sub-national region apart from California and Tuscany. These people should be spending their tax-payers’ money on something more useful.

While I think many people could readily name a few more sub-national regions than those two, he is right to question the utility of promoting tourism on a Statewide rather than a national or region-specific basis. Many international tourists may never have heard of Queensland and would be more receptive to messages about Australia, while domestic tourists would be more responsive to messages regarding particular holiday destinations (e.g. Gold Coast or Port Douglas) rather than Queensland as a whole.

This entry was posted in Tourism. Bookmark the permalink.

1 Response to Does tourism promotion on a Statewide basis make sense?

  1. Jen says:

    A good observation. I had not thought of it in that way before.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s