Increased train frequency unviable

With an already heavily subsidised public transport system, as reported on by the Courier-Mail this morning (Taxpayers in front line of fight to cut fares hike), it is clear Queensland cannot afford to either defer fare increases or to increase the frequency of train services. Unfortunately, in addition to its commitment to reduce fare increases, the Government made an election commitment to increase the frequency of services on the Ferny Grove line, and this has raised expectations regarding the frequency of services on the Ipswich line (Long wait for new rail services).

Creating a viable public transport system is a wicked policy problem, because we can’t turn around the pattern of urban development/sprawl that means it is costly to run public transport over such large areas.

There are no simple policy recommendations (certainly cuts to off-peak services would be inequitable and politically toxic), and a comprehensive review is required that looks at the whole transport system holistically. This would consider the wide range of benefits provided by public transport, including the avoided costs of road congestion, avoided/deferred road infrastructure spending, reduced greenhouse gas emissions and health benefits from people walking to train stations or bus stops.

While the heavily subsidised Gold Coast and Sunshine Coast rail services definitely require review, we would need to consider the costly increase in congestion on the M1 and Bruce Highway, as well as arterial roads in Brisbane, that would occur if fares were increased substantially or services cut back.

One policy the Government ought to consider is to stagger the starting and finishing times of public servants to reduce the pressure on peak hour services as there is plenty of public transport capacity in off-peak times. This would complement the existing policy push for greater decentralisation of public services.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Transport. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Increased train frequency unviable

  1. Jen says:

    It will be interesting to see how Premier Newman is going to increase rail services while at the same time deferring fare increases. The money has to come from somewhere after all. I would prefer a fare increase if it meant more services and track maintenance was not cut back. Cutting back off peak services would certainly upset many people through the disruption it would cause, so that should not even be contemplated.

  2. Pingback: SEQ’s extensive but costly public transport system requires thorough review | Queensland Economy Watch

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s