Surely just a matter of time before decriminalisation of cannabis and other drugs

Last Friday, the US House of Representatives passed a law decriminalising cannabis at the federal level. Unfortunately, as noted in this CNN report, the law has very little chance of being upheld by the US Senate, but it was good to see lower house support for decriminalisation. Surely, it is only a matter of time now before widespread decriminalisation of cannabis and other drugs in western nations, as it’s pretty apparent the war on drugs has failed and community attitudes have changed massively in the last few decades.

Moreover, there would likely be large economic and social benefits from decriminalisation of cannabis and allowing for its recreational use in Australia. The Queensland Productivity Commission recommended decriminalisation of drugs earlier this year, but alas the Government rejected its recommendation. This was despite the potential savings of hundreds of millions of dollars per annum in justice system costs and billions in future capital spending for new prisons, as noted by the ABC’s Matt Wordsworth in in January: Drug decriminalisation would ‘save hundreds of millions’, but Queensland Premier rules it out. With the state government now at the beginning of a four-year term, it should consider reforming our out-of-date and costly drug laws.

For previous coverage of the issue on this blog, check out:

Disappointing that drugs won’t be decriminalised in Qld

Blunt message to states from Canberra on recreational cannabis – guest post from Stephen Thornton

Cannabis with Dr Stephen Thornton

This entry was posted in Health and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Surely just a matter of time before decriminalisation of cannabis and other drugs

  1. johnsnowy says:

    Personally I would immediately make any and all drugs legal. This would really thin out the ranks of the criminal and the stupid! Of course the law change would also ensure that anyone who took a drug could not use that as a reason for any impairment of their judgement. If would not count in any way so full force of the law would fall on them.
    Initially it would be lots of deaths but then it would just clean out the most unfit. Win, win.

  2. Hasbeen says:

    It would be more likely to clean out lots of innocent motorists & pedestrians along the way, many more than the druggies it would get rid of.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s