Were 80% of new Qld jobs in 2015-16 public service jobs?

The Courier-Mail is correct to highlight the large increase in public service employment that has occurred recently in Queensland, and it is on the right track in suggesting public service jobs are a large share of new jobs created, but it is misinterpreting the data when it claims that:

“THE State Government’s massive public servant hiring spree bankrolled 80 per cent of the additional jobs created in Queensland in the last financial year.”

That is not strictly correct. Because some sectors, such as mining, have had falls in employment, you cannot simply calculate the increase in public service numbers (8,500) as a percentage of new jobs in Queensland (10,400 in 2015-16 in trend terms), as the Courier-Mail has done. The decline in mining employment in 2015-16 was around 6,500 jobs (measured in four-quarter moving average terms, due to the data only being available in original un-adjusted form from the ABS). Now, if we take 8,500 new public service jobs, subtract 6,500 lost mining jobs, we are left with net jobs growth of 2,000, which is 8,400 short of the 10,400 increase overall. So 8,400 new jobs must have come from sectors other than the Queensland public service, such as hospitality, aged care and private health and education providers. In other words, Queensland public service jobs may be around half of new jobs created in 2015-16, but not 80%.

The Courier-Mail would be well advised to get a copy of math guru Jordan Ellenberg’s How Not to be Wrong which has a good section on the challenges of interpreting employment growth data and other data where component parts can be positive or negative. Ellenberg’s advice is (on p. 78 of the Penguin edition):

“Don’t talk about percentages of numbers when the numbers might be negative.”

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Labour market, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Were 80% of new Qld jobs in 2015-16 public service jobs?

  1. Katrina drake says:

    One of my favourite books ! It is a very good and insightful read indeed ! K

    • Gene Tunny says:

      Yes, it’s an excellent book. It should be compulsory reading for anyone whose job involves interpreting data/statistics, which is the bulk of professionals I’d suggest (to varying extents, of course). Thanks for the comment, Katrina!

  2. James G says:

    The Courier Mail gets something wrong! Who’d have thought 😉

  3. Jim says:

    Yes the Courier Mail were wrong (as they often are), but you cannot expect modern newspaper staff to think too deeply, particularly if it isn’t an attribute rewarded by their owners.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s