Public benefits of BIFF and BAPFF questionable

With pressing needs in health and education, it seems obvious to me that there is little public benefit from supporting film festivals, whether in the form of the former Brisbane International Film Festival (BIFF) or its replacement, the Brisbane Asia Pacific Film Festival (BAPFF). Hence I’m mostly unmoved by former BIFF Director Richard Moore’s opinion piece in the Brisbane Times Death of BIFF a mortal blow to Brisbane’s film community, although at least he is right to avoid an economic justification for supporting BIFF, instead focussing on its cultural benefits.

In an article on film industry assistance published in Policy last year, Moochers Making Movies, I argued the only possible legitimate reason to support the film industry is to promote the development of Australian content that helps tell the Australian story. So Richard Moore might have a point, in that BIFF was more likely to provide public benefits than BAPFF will be, given that BAPFF appears less focussed on local filmmakers and more on filmmakers from elsewhere in the Asia Pacific. However, I’d much rather re-direct the money now going to BAPFF to health, education or tax cuts, which I think would yield greater public benefits.

Also see my ABC Drum article on the film industry:

Taxpayer money wasted chasing film productions

This entry was posted in Industry policy and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Public benefits of BIFF and BAPFF questionable

  1. T. Ode says:

    The problem I had with BIFF was that although there was government funding provided, we still had to pay quite a lot to see things with very little choice of viewing times. If they want to devote money to a cultural agenda (so we get to see unexpected Georgian films for example) then let’s give it to SBS with a requirement that it has to be spent on world movies that are publicly available to be seen on watch-later-view online. That way public funding could provide cultural products that are also publicly available to a wider audience using public infrastructure.

    • Gene Tunny says:

      Thanks for the comment, T.Ode. Funding for SBS may certainly be a better use of taxpayer funds than a film festival as SBS would have more viewers than a film festival attendees.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s